Signatures are user-selected bits of text that follow each post by a given poster.
Signatures are currently turned off in the interest of readability, but we'd be interested to hear your opinion; would you prefer they be on, maybe for a trial period or something?
Kindly post your opinion and comment if you like.
John will wield his mighty baton of signature-deciding with imperious compassion and wisdom, I'm sure.
Merlin wrote:Believe me, you don't want to see these guys naked.
a) Ooooh you probably shouldn't put that past me. I'm a strange person. (You might have an easier life if you don't put anything past me methinks...)
b) It's not about what I actually want to see, it's about what I theoretically want to be able to vote for. (Sexual equality and stuff.)
c) [void]
d) As one of my friends is wont to say: "Be happy. Be nude." (I feel like a hippie now)
e) Damn. I already voted.
I like having signatures, but do think they should be limited. I'm on another message bored that obviously doesn't limit size and some of those signatures are out of control. One persons post can take up a whole page just because of their signature.
I love the guys and all, but I'm gonna have to agree w/Merlin. I really don't want to see them naked. Sorry John. ;)
I'm getting the feeling that John is a little upset that no one wants to see him naked. I, for one, also do not want to see him naked. And I say that as a fan.